7 years, 4 months, and 19 days. Sadder than sad.

My dearest Shosh and Jaialai:

In their younger days, while at boarding school, your Aunt VL would ask Aunt LV to cut her hair.  The latter would refuse, knowing what would follow.  EAch time, the former promised to be different.  But, after each hair cut, she’d wail and demand, “Give my hair back to me!  Give me back my hair!”

I understand the feeling.  These days, I look the heavens, cry and say, “Give me back my life!  Give my life back to me!”

Friends who knew what I had lost during my years fighting the Enron of Healthcare called me Job, whom God rewarded after having lost everything.  I dare not presume to be Job.  But, more importantly, I don’t want to be Job.  He lost all of his children, and God subsequently gave him new ones.  I never understood that.  Kids are not replaceable.  Each is special and one cannot replace another.

I want you guys.  I want back the years since when you, Shosh, were nine, and Jaialai, five.  I want to watch you grow up at each stage of your development.  I want to be there to hear your stories, jokes, and laughter; teach you to shave, drive, graduate, apply to colleges, etc.

Having missed all that makes me immeasurably and inconsolably sad … a deep, cavernous sadness that swallows all the light and joy the world could ever offer.

I miss you … more than words can ever express.  You are loved … forever and always,

Dad

P.S., by the way, it’s OK to be sad.  It’s a normal life experience.  Often, the moment passes and I get back to task of living and fighting my way back to you.  On more difficult days, I work through it the best I can, then wait for the morning light and the promise of a new day.  Days may pass, but light always prevails.

Don’t wallow in sadness.  Don’t feed it, hold on to it, and wonder why you live in misery.  Greet it, acknowledge it, then let it pass.  Embrace life.  Tend to the hard work of living.  Focus on that and the sadness will dissipate before you know it.

 

7 years, 4 months, and 14 days. Personal freedom and personal responsibilities are two sides of the same coin. Act responsibly.

Global report: don’t count on vaccine, US scientist warns, as cases pass 5m

A top US scientist has said that people should not count on a Covid-19 vaccine being developed any time soon, as global infections passed 5 million after surges in Latin America, including Brazil, which has recorded nearly 20,000 new cases.

William Haseltine, the groundbreaking cancer, HIV/AIDS and human genome projects researcher, has said the best approach to the pandemic is to manage the disease through careful tracing of infections and strict isolation measures whenever it starts spreading.

He said that while a vaccine could be developed, “I wouldn’t count on it”, and urged people to wear masks, wash hands, clean surfaces and keep a distance.

“Do not listen to the politicians who say we’re going to have one by the time my re election comes around,” he said. “Maybe we will (but) I’m just saying it’s not a slam-dunk case by any means … because every time people have tried to make a vaccine – for Sars or Mers – it hasn’t actually protected.”

Vaccines developed previously for other types of coronavirus had failed to protect mucous membranes in the nose where the virus typically enters the body, he said.

The United States and other countries has not done enough to “forcibly isolate” people exposed to the virus, Haseltine said, but praised China, South Korea and Taiwan’s efforts to curb infections.

Haseltine said the US, Russia and Brazil – which rank first, second and third for infections – have done the worst.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/may/21/global-report-coronavirus-vaccine-us-scientist-cases-5-million (emphasis added)

 

There is one ingredient essential to reopening the economy, and still no federal plan to get it

THE CURRENT approach to the coronavirus pandemic in the United States is based on wishful thinking — that a vaccine or drug therapy will be available by the end of the year, or sooner; that death and illness will taper off with the summer heat, and not come back next fall. But what if none of this happens? What if the novel coronavirus sticks around for a year or two or longer? In that case, diagnostic testing will be critical to our ability to manage lives, jobs, schools and health. Yet we still lack a federal strategy to get there.

Diagnostic testing is important, absent a vaccine or therapy, as part of a concerted effort to identify the sick, isolate and treat them, and allow everyone else to get back to business. Right now, testing is the foundation of state decisions about reopening, yet the testing landscape is disorderly and inadequate. After a miserable start, the pace of testing is slowly ramping up, now exceeding 400,000 daily. But that is still far, far below what experts say would be required to sustain a new normal. The effort has been left to 50 states and a hodgepodge of academic laboratories, hospitals and private companies. Some laboratories are overwhelmed, and others underutilized.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/there-is-one-ingredient-essential-to-reopening-the-economy-and-still-no-federal-plan-to-get-it/2020/05/22/4a992ad4-9c67-11ea-ac72-3841fcc9b35f_story.html (emphasis added)

 

GOP governor offers emotional plea to the anti-mask crowd: Stop this senseless culture war

Burgum suggested the debate over masks was being needlessly politicized and that those who are bucking federal health officials’ guidance should rethink their posture.

“I would really love to see in North Dakota that we could just skip this thing that other parts of the nation are going through where they’re trading a divide – either it’s ideological or political or something – around masks versus no mask,” Burgum said. “This is a, I would say, senseless dividing line, and I would ask people to try to dial up your empathy and your understanding.”

The subtext of the remarks was pretty clear: This is a needless culture war.

Burgum then want on, getting emotional.

“If someone is wearing a mask, they’re not doing it to represent what political party they’re in or what candidates they support,” Burgum said, before his voice began breaking. “They might be doing it because they’ve got a 5-year-old child who’s been going through cancer treatments. They might have vulnerable adults in their life who currently have covid, and they’re fighting.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/05/23/doug-burgum-masks/ (emphasis added)

 

Sweden’s Covid-19 strategy has caused an ‘amplification of the epidemic’

Sweden is famously one of the few countries to have opted against a lockdown to contain the spread of the coronavirus. But given that the country has a much higher death toll per million than its Nordic neighbours, many observers have suggested that the Swedish approach has failed.

While countries across the world have eased Covid-19 lockdowns over recent weeks, Sweden stands out: it never imposed confinement measures to begin with. As billions hunkered down throughout the globe in late March, Swedish bars, restaurants, hairdressers, gyms and even primary and middle schools stayed open.

There have been some exceptions. Secondary schools and museums have been closed, sport fixtures cancelled and gatherings of more than 50 people banned. Swedes have been asked to stay at home if they are over 70 or are feeling unwell. Social distancing has been requested in public places. And on Thursday, the government urged Swedes to avoid unnecessary international travel and to limit car journeys within the country to two hours.

But even these measures – minimal by the standards of numerous other countries – have been laxly enforced. Police are unable to impose fines to enforce social distancing; they can only tell people to comply.

The Swedish approach has won praise from figures on the American right such as Fox News host Tucker Carlson, who have suggested that it provides a model for the US to follow.

‘People who think they can’t die’

In making the case for its unorthodox policy, Stockholm has pointed to high levels of trust in Swedish society, arguing that people could be expected to take precautions without being told to.

“There are people who are really diligent and are doing exactly what they should do, but there are too many who don’t,” said Elisabeth Asbrink, a Swedish author, freelance journalist and prominent critic of the government’s approach. In parts of Stockholm, “people are doing all the things they usually do, as if there’s no need to keep a distance”, she continued. “I’ve also visited Malmo (Sweden’s third-biggest city) and there’s a lot of people there who think they can’t die, somehow; they think they’re unapproachable by this disease.”

Figures compiled by data analysis website Statista show that the total number of confirmed Covid-19 cases in Sweden has been increasing steadily since the beginning of April – and now stands at more than 29,000.

Statistics suggest that Sweden has performed poorly compared to its Scandinavian neighbours, which imposed strict lockdowns. Experts say the other Nordic countries are the most apt points of comparison, given their similar healthcare systems, socio-political cultures and levels of connectedness.

Reported coronavirus deaths per million in Sweden stand at 358, according to Statista – even higher than the hard-hit US, at 267. The Swedish figure is dramatically worse than those of Denmark (93), Finland (53) and Norway (44). In Sweden, “we’re seeing an amplification of the epidemic, because there’s simply more social contact”, said Lynn Goldman, dean of the Milken Institute School of Public Health at George Washington University in the US.

https://www.france24.com/en/20200517-sweden-s-covid-19-strategy-has-caused-an-amplification-of-the-epidemic

 

 

My dearest Shosh and Jailai:

America is a country of contrarians.  Before the pandemic, many Americans preferred to couch surf in front of their TVs and video games, contributing to the obesity epidemic had been burdening America for years.  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3228640/; and, https://www.webmd.com/diet/obesity/features/obesity-epidemic-astronomical#1 (“So what’s causing the epidemic? Not surprisingly, everyone agrees that it stems from two things: eating too much and exercising too little.”).  Health practitioners had long sounded the alarm for people, especially kids, to go outside and get exercise.  But the latter refused in growing numbers.  Then, the pandemic hits and social isolation was imposed.  Now, many of the people who once preferred to stay inside and couch surf clamor to be allowed outside.

Look, no one wants to be cooped up inside, and no one wants to wear pesky masks.  I get it.  We all hate it.

But the question is: why are we doing it?  We know, for example, masks are not 100% prophylactic, yet public health guidelines strongly recommend we use them.  Why?  Because masks help to protect others in the community in case we are asymptomatic carriers of the virus.  In other words, wearing mask is a charitable and necessary act for the benefit of our fellow citizens. Studies prove this over and over again.  See, e.g., https://arxiv.org/pdf/2004.13553.pdf; and, https://rs-delve.github.io/reports/2020/05/04/face-masks-for-the-general-public.html.  Fools ignore the data, such as those coming out of Sweden, showing how the lack of social distancing and lax enforcement has resulted in the country having greater deaths per millions than even the U.S.!!!  The U.S., which has roughly 4% of the world’s population, has nearly a third of the world’s infected and COVID-19 deaths.  These are not badges of honor but of selfishness, ignorance, and arrogance.

We forget — or maybe too many of us are no longer taught — that personal freedom comes with personal responsibilities.  You have a right to act as you wish, but you do NOT have a right to endanger others in the community.

This moral and legal tenet plays out numerous times every single day.  You have the freedom to drink alcohol and get drunk, but you do NOT have the right to drive drunk and endanger the community.  You are free to say what you wish, but you are NOT free to shout “FIRE!” in a crowded movie theater as a prank.  You have a right to discharge your firearm, but you are NOT allowed to randomly discharge your firearm in the middle of a crowded city even if you are not aiming at any particular person.

It is no different with those infected with the corona virus who venture into crowded areas unprotected.  We know many of the more than 1.6 million infected in the U.S. are asymptomatic.  They are unsuspecting carriers of the deadly virus for which we have neither treatment nor vaccine.  By not practicing social distancing or not wearing masks, they harm and potentially kill many others.  That is not OK.  It is irresponsible of them to treat the health and well-being of others so lightly.

There actions are not dissimilar to AIDS infected individuals who knowingly have unprotected sex with unsuspecting victims.  In many states in the U.S., that is a crime.  https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/policies/law/states/exposure.html.  Here, the only difference is that the infected are often asymptomatic and may be unaware of their conditions.  However, given the virulence of the virus and the fact that more than 1.6 millions Americans have been confirmed to be infected — a number that represent a significant undercounting given the challenges we’ve had with testing — it behooves each of us to act responsibly and assume the worst in order to protect others (until we have been tested and know we are in the clear as of the day of the test).

Recall in the movie World War Z, how Brad Pitt, the hero, separated himself from others when he thought he had been exposed to the zombie virus.  Standing on the ledge of a high rise while counting down to see if he had been infected, he was prepared to take drastic measures to prevent himself from harming others if he were infected.  (N.B.: I’m not suggesting that we commit suicide to prevent infecting others!)  That’s what heroes do.  They think of others and act to save others at great inconvenience to themselves.

Because we have no treatment or vaccine against COVID-19, the ONLY viable strategy we have at our disposal at this point is social isolation and social hygiene.  Thus, stay in, adhere to social distancing unless absolutely necessary, and wear masks when you must go out.

Be kind.  Be responsible.  Be disciplined.  Be principled.  Be critical thinkers.

Public policies that ask the least of each citizen while shifting or imposing great costs onto others — especially the elderly, the sick, and the vulnerable — are immoral.  However, as free men and women who are moral beings and critical thinkers, we each can choose to act responsibly regardless of what our “leaders” suggest.  They are animated by political motives and not by our individual or collective well-being.  Further, they have the luxury of getting tested daily while most Americans still lack access to such tests.  Pay them no heed.  Let your moral compass and your humanity guide you.

So, don’t be a contrarian just to be contrary.  Don’t be selfish, obstinate and childish.  Think first.  And, unless you live by yourself in a cave in the middle of nowhere, think of others who may be adversely affected by your actions during The Time of the Corona Virus.

Act responsibly.  THE LIVES OF OTHERS DEPEND ON IT.

God is watching.  Karma won’t be kind if you act selfishly.  But I shouldn’t have to go there.  Be of good moral character and do what you know in your heart is right.

All my love, always and forever,

Dad

 

 

7 years, 4 months, and 8 days. It’s NOT all about you! Don’t be selfish!

As coronavirus testing expands, a new problem arises: Not enough people to test

Four months into the U.S. coronavirus outbreak, tests for the virus finally are becoming widely available, a crucial step toward lifting stay-at-home orders and safely returning to normal life. But while many states no longer report crippling supply shortages, a new problem has emerged: too few people lining up to get tested.

A Washington Post survey of governors’ offices and state health departments found at least a dozen states where testing capacity outstrips the supply of patients. Many have scrambled to make testing more convenient, especially for vulnerable communities, by setting up pop-up sites and developing apps that help assess symptoms, find free test sites and deliver quick results.

But the numbers, while rising, are well short of capacity — and far short of targets set by independent experts. Utah, for example, is conducting about 3,500 tests a day, a little more than a third of its 9,000-test maximum capacity, and health officials have erected highway billboards begging drivers to “GET TESTED FOR COVID-19.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/as-coronavirus-testing-expands-a-new-problem-arises-not-enough-people-to-test/2020/05/17/3f3297de-8bcd-11ea-8ac1-bfb250876b7a_story.html

My dearest Shosh and Jaialai:

It saddens me terribly that we, Americans, are such a selfish people.  Despite the Christian faith that lays the foundation for the natural laws upon which America is built, we forget Jesus’s two simple commandments:

  1. Love God
  2. Love your neighbors

Testing for the corona virus and adhering to social distancing guidelines are not about us, but about our neighbors, about doing what we can to protect our communities from the ravages of a disease against which we have no protection at this time.  It is that simple.

Yet the selfish manage to make it all about them.  And they wonder why America has long had an epidemic of loneliness.

If you make it all about you, why should anyone care about you?  You care nothing for anyone else, so what did you expect?

Don’t be like that.  You are better than that.

Don’t condemn yourselves to a life of misery.  Live for others.  Be kind to and be mindful of your neighbors.  You will find life much more rewarding, even if you do come across a few bad apples at times.

All my love, always and forever,

Dad

P.S., by the way, this refusal to test is a function of both selfishness and ignorance.  The laws of nature and of science exist regardless of whether people believe in them.  The corona virus is here and infects people indiscriminately.

The corona virus doesn’t care if you believe in testing, the social distancing guidelines, in the scientific inefficacy of idiotic strategies like ingesting or injecting yourselves with disinfectants, etc.  If you don’t practice safe social hygiene and test to see if you are infected, the greater probability is that you will get infected, and you will expose your loved ones and members of your community to the virus.

Their deaths will be on you.  Ignorance kills.

7 years, 4 months, and 5 days. Focus on your audience; mind their Lizard Brain and the fear and insecurities that animate most people.

Experts have jobs. They need to understand those who don’t.

Columnist: Education: Yale College, BA; Harvard University, PhD

If anyone thought a global pandemic that has so far killed more than 80,000 Americans would override the country’s deep partisan divide, think again. It turns out that Democrats are significantly more likely than Republicans to believe that the pandemic is serious and to follow Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines. Cellphone data shows that people in counties that voted for Donald Trump have been moving around more than those in counties that voted for Hillary Clinton.

This has led many to wonder why partisanship has become so strong in the United States that people will not listen to experts, even at the risk of their own health. But there is a broader distrust that we need to understand. I recognized it while reading a book that is not about covid-19 at all but sheds strong light on the situation. Explaining why so many people across the West have rejected the government establishment, Michael Lind writes, “The issue is not the issue. . . . The issue is power. Social power exists in three realms — government, the economy, and the culture. Each of these three realms of social power is the site of class conflict.”

Lind’s book, “The New Class War,” argues that the best way to understand America today is through the lens of class conflict, which has been sharpened by the rise of an “overclass” that dominates the three spheres he mentions. In all three, leaders tend to be urban, college-educated professionals, often with a postgraduate degree. That makes them quite distinct from much of the rest of the country. Only 36 percent of Americans have a bachelor’s degree, and only 13 percent have a master’s or more. And yet, the top echelons everywhere are filled with this “credentialed overclass.”

For many non-college-educated people, especially those living in rural areas, there is a deep alienation from this new elite. They see the overclass as enacting policies that are presented as good for the whole country but really mostly benefit people from the ruling class, whose lives have gotten better over the past few decades while the rest are left behind. In this view, trade and immigration help college-educated professionals who work for multinational companies but hurt blue-collar workers. So when they hear from “experts” about the inevitability of globalization and technological change and the need to accept it, they resist. It does not resonate with their lived experience.

Let’s look at the covid-19 crisis through this prism. Imagine you are an American who works with his hands — a truck driver, a construction worker, an oil rig mechanic — and you have just lost your job because of the lockdowns, as have more than 36 million people. You turn on the television and hear medical experts, academics, technocrats and journalists explain that we must keep the economy closed — in other words, keep you unemployed — because public health is important. All these people making the case have jobs, have maintained their standards of living and in fact are now in greater demand. They feel as though they are doing important work. You, on the other hand, have lost your job. You feel a sense of worthlessness, and you’re terrified about your family’s day-to-day survival. Is it so hard to understand why people like this might be skeptical of the experts?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/experts-have-jobs-they-need-to-understand-those-who-dont/2020/05/14/e715e534-9620-11ea-91d7-cf4423d47683_story.html

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/experts-have-jobs-they-need-to-understand-those-who-dont/2020/05/14/e715e534-9620-11ea-91d7-cf4423d47683_story.html

 

My most dearest Shosh and Jaialai:

This is one of the better analyses I’ve read in the din of the 24-hour pandemic news cycle.  We, Americans, have gotten into the habit of talking AT each other rather than TO each other.  Communication, at its core, is about engaging in meaningful exchanges.  Yet, sadly, we prefer reaching for easy labels (e.g., GOP, Democrat, far-right, liberal, etc.) as excuses to tune out each other rather than make the effort to truly listen and understand where our neighbors are coming from.

Let’s not forget, we are all Americans.   We are neighbors.  For better or for worse, we are in this together.  Together we stand: divided we fall.

Let’s start with a fundamental truth: for the most part, WE are ALL coming from a place of fear and insecurity during this pandemic.  Most of us have some level of food and housing insecurities.  Without work and income (or with reduced work and income), our basic needs for food, warmth, safety, etc., are threatened.  We are afraid.

“When we feel threatened, the most primitive part of our brain, what we call our ‘lizard brain,’ gets activated. We’re just reacting, just focused on survival[,]” said Jean Fitzpatrick, a New York City Midtown therapist.  “Brain science is important here[.]”  https://whydidyoujointheunion.blogspot.com/2017/01/basic-lizard-brain-psychology-can.html.

In 1954, the limbic cortex was described by neuroanatomists. Since that time, the limbic system of the brain has been implicated as the seat of emotion, addiction, mood, and lots of other mental and emotional processes. It is the part of the brain that is phylogenetically very primitive. Many people call it the “Lizard Brain,” because the limbic system is about all a lizard has for brain function. It is in charge of fight, flight, feeding, fear, freezing up, and fornication.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/where-addiction-meets-your-brain/201404/your-lizard-brain.

 

Do you ever surprise yourself, finding that you have done something without thinking about it? Do you ever notice that you feel sad or happy, but aren’t sure why?

In 1990, physician and neuroscientist Paul MacLean provided one possible explanation of this phenomenon in his book, The Triune Brain in Evolution. Although scientists now know that some of the details may be wrong, it remains a useful concept. The idea is that our human brains are really composed of three parts:

1. The reptilian brain, composed of the basal ganglia (striatum) and brainstem, is involved with primitive drives related to thirst, hunger, sexuality, and territoriality, as well as habits and procedural memory (like putting your keys in the same place every day without thinking about it or riding a bike).

2. The paleomammalian (old mammal) brain, including the hypothalamus, hippocampus, amygdala, and cingulate cortex, is the center of our motivation, emotions, and memory, including behavior such as parenting.

3. The neomammalian (new mammal) brain, consisting of the neocortex, enables language, abstraction, reasoning, and planning.

Automatic routines which, over time, we have learned do without thinking about them, such as playing tennis and even driving, are largely performed by our reptilian brain. So when we are driving and, at the same time, engrossed in a conversation with a friend, we may find that we have driven somewhere with no memory of how we did it — that’s because the reptilian brain was doing most of the driving….

Our neomammalian brains — and, in particular, our frontal lobes — govern our behavior, inhibiting the primitive drives from our reptilian brain when they are not socially appropriate….

Given that there have been 10 million years of evolution developing our neocortex — our neomammalian brain — why does it seem to fail so often in normal individuals? Why do we so often hear about politicians and celebrities acting on their primitive drives and urges and committing horrendous acts?

The answer is one that any small child can give you: We all can make a choice, a choice as to whether we are going to give in to the primitive urges and desires of our reptilian brain or, instead, use our neocortex to control them.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/managing-your-memory/201712/don-t-listen-your-lizard-brain (emphasis added).

 

Once threatened, your lizard brain doesn’t waste time in thoughts. In lightning speed, it brings past experiences and well-worn assumptions to present situations. It hijacks your “thinking brain”—your prefrontal cortex or executive functioning—throws it offline before you realize it and prepares you for fight or flight to keep you out of harm’s way. When your buttons are pushed, it issues a warning, and the cells of your body heed its call, drenching you in a cocktail of neuropeptides that create a rapid-fire reaction to threat. You can feel the exact moment your lizard brain dumps a tonic of heart-pounding enzymes into your bloodstream. The surging adrenaline and cortisol act like a tidal wave, hijacking your rational thoughts, leaving your emotions to rush to action. You may sizzle on the inside or rant and rave on the outside—but you survive.

The problem is that ancient lizard brains were designed for a very different time, with a specific and limited set of threats. Your twenty-first-century lizard brain ramps up into survival mode not only over immediate physical danger but more psychological concerns as well. It doesn’t know the difference between lethal and non-lethal situations. It’s just as likely to blast a colleague for challenging your ideas, the server when you’re stuck in a long, slow-moving lunch line, or your hard-nosed, demanding boss for belittling you in a meeting. It will unleash its ire on you, too, for slip-ups such as misplacing your cell phone, accidentally dinging another car, or missing an appointment.

Even though studies show that 90 percent of worries are false alarms that never manifest, your lizard brain prioritizes and remembers the negative experiences in an attempt to prevent life’s unexpected curve balls from ambushing you. Think of all the times you brooded for countless hours over one negative aspect of a situation when, in retrospect, there was nothing to worry about. In fact, your lizard brain may have overlooked many positive elements. Your colleagues gave you rave reviews on your presentation, but you couldn’t get that one frowning face in the front row off your mind. The majority of your coworkers attended the retirement party, but the fact that your boss was a no-show continues to flash in your brain like a neon Failure sign. And what about all those times you wigged out over an upcoming presentation, convinced you would fall flat on your face when, not only did you not fail, you were a huge success—all that worry for nothing—the exact opposite of what your lizard brain predicted.

Nobody Can Trigger Your Lizard Brain Without Your Consent

It helps to know that, when your lizard brain takes over with reflexive reaction, you’re usually not in any real danger, as when Pope Francis smacked the hand of an overly zealous congregant who wouldn’t let go of his arm. Neuroscientists say, that in the heat of the moment, your lizard brain simply overestimates a threat and underestimates your ability to handle it. It’s often nothing more than you’re simply upset that people and things aren’t doing what you want, or life isn’t working out the way you planned—the way it’s “supposed to.”

Think about it. You expect daily aspects of your job to play out in a certain direction or adjust to your desires and whims. Of course, the job will never bend to your will—it doesn’t work that way. Bear in mind if you continue down the rabbit hole of expecting the workplace to be the way you want, you automatically set yourself up for disappointment, heartbreak, and your own unbridled reactions that will unmake your day along with that of others.

The problem isn’t your life; it’s your brain. You’re not jinxed, life doesn’t have a vendetta against you, and other people and situations are not causing your outbursts. You are. Nothing and nobody can unmake your day but you.Every time you lose it when a situation or person does something you don’t like, it’s your responsibility, not theirs. Think about it. When you’re unable to regulate your outbursts and flip your lid, does that really make things better? Or does it make them worse? After circling the parking lot a few times before finding the closest spot to your office, is it worth pounding your steering wheel? Does it actually matter if you don’t score the best restaurant table by the window for your business meeting? I mean, seriously. Do you really need to badmouth a colleague because they’re different from you?

Even for our modern-day selves, no longer dwelling in caves and running from tigers, the lizard brain serves a vital role in protecting us. Constantly on the lookout, it watches out when you’re driving in heavy traffic, searching for your car in a dark parking garage, or struggling to meet a tight deadline. If your office is on fire, someone breaks into your house or you’re in a car wreck or terrorist attack, it keeps you safe from harm. But when you live in that amped-up state for too long—alarm bells ringing at full blast—it drains your clarity, optimism, peace of mind, well-being, and resilience for personal growth.

Sidestepping Your Lizard Brain Reactions: The 90-Second Gap

You’re not powerful enough to fend off unwelcome career challenges. Mishaps, unpleasant surprises, and threatening moments are going to happen no matter what. The key is what you do with them to stay cool under pressure. The good news is you are powerful enough to choose how you respond to them. It’s possible to sidestep your lizard brain from siphoning your energy by learning not to let every little hiccup throw you into a tizzy—whether it’s a printer paper jam, a traffic jam, or grape jam smeared across your clean floor.

You always have a choice to respond with either action or reaction—regardless of how small or big the circumstances. In an interview, brain researcher Dr. Jill Bolte Taylor told me, “When a person has a reaction to something in their environment, there’s a 90-second chemical process that happens; any remaining emotional response is just the person choosing to stay in that emotional loop.” In other words, when you react to a situation, you make a choice to do so—an unconscious choice perhaps, but a choice nonetheless. You can be your own worst enemy when you allow your lizard brain to have open season on others and yourself.

The secret sauce is to discover the 90-second gap between what you feel and what you do. You might not recognize the gap is there. If you’re on autopilot, as so many of us are, chances are your hair-trigger reactions are in the habit of running roughshod over the gap. But once you start to look for and find it, you’re able to make a choice with action instead of reaction. That’s how you empower yourself, that’s how you prevent burnout and rekindle your energy, and that’s how you get back your mojo to thrive. The more you practice this approach, the more the gap will widen over time. The more resilient you will become in facing obstacles, tough decisions, and hard choices. And the more freedom you will enjoy in your life.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-right-mindset/202001/whos-the-boss-you-or-your-lizard-brain (emphasis added)

So the lesson today is choose to NOT give in to your lizard brain, and to PAY ATTENTION when the lizard brain of others animates their actions.  They are trying to tell you they are scared.  So, before you do anything else, address their fears.  Without addressing their fears first, you will not get anywhere with anything else.

Without endeavoring to hear each other and address each others’ fears, we are destined to keep repeating our mistakes.  For example, there remains a huge anti-immigration backlash in the U.S., driven mostly by people who are job insecure and who fear that immigrants would take away their jobs.  Their fear is valid; however, it may be misplaced.

One example is the harsh anti-immigration laws that were enacted in Georgia, Alabama, and other Southern states in 2011.  The unintended consequences was that migrant workers left those states in droves and those states’ agricultural sector suffered greatly as a result.  Farmers simply could not find Americans willing to do the hard work of picking fruits and vegetables.  They sent vans into Atlanta, for example, to pick up workers for the fields and increased payments to attract more workers, but it was all for naught.  Americans simply did not want those jobs.  See, e.g., https://www.mic.com/articles/8272/alabama-illegal-immigrant-crackdown-destroys-farm-business; https://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2012/05/17/the-law-of-unintended-consequences-georgias-immigration-law-backfires/#239d113e492a; and, https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2011/06/georgias-harsh-immigration-law-costs-millions-in-unharvested-crops/240774/.

Likewise, fear of the corona virus today has, sadly, lead to heightened racism against AsiansSee, e.g., https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/hospital-physician-relationships/asian-american-physicians-deliver-anti-discrimination-message-in-viral-video.html; https://time.com/collection/coronavirus-heroes/5816886/asian-american-doctor-coronavirus/; https://www.nbcnews.com/news/asian-america/asian-americans-report-nearly-500-racist-acts-over-last-week-n1169821; and, https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/04/02/targeting-asians-asian-americans-will-make-it-harder-stop-covid-19/.  The fear is misplaced.

Asians are no more to be blamed for the corona virus than are Americans for the “superbugs” that infect nearly 2 million and kill nearly 100,000 Americans each year.  See, e.g., https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/hospitals-and-superbugs/; https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/04/190414111500.htm; and, https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2016/p0303-superbugs.html. Misusing antibiotics (such as taking them when you don’t need them or not finishing all of your medicine) is the ‘single leading factor’ contributing to this problem, the CDC says.”  https://www.webmd.com/a-to-z-guides/news/20150417/superbugs-what-they-are.

Life finds a way.  Regardless of what we do, sooner or later, the billions upon billions of viruses and bacteria that cover the surface of this Earth will find a way to dominate.  We can focus on fighting them or each other.  (I’m not saying give up and do nothing.  I am saying be smart and pick our battles to slow their progression.  For example, ban pharmaceuticals from advertising antibiotics directly to consumers, who then demand those antibiotics from their physicians regardless of whether it is medically necessary or advisable.  Ban — immediately — the  misuse of antibiotics in animal feeds.)

But I am getting ahead of myself.  For now, for you, focus on being your best and on listening to others.  Train your focus on the person with whom you are speaking or dealing with instead of on yourself.  I promise you that you will find life more rewarding and less problematic when you do that.  Instead of focusing on, and giving in to, your fears and insecurities, if you help others address theirs you will have a better chance of finding win-win solutions and you will be happier for it.

This ties in with my previous post about focusing on others, minding your words, and delivering small chunks of information at a time to make others comfortable as you help them resolve their problems.  In other words, keep things simple and calm, and speak to their lizard brain to talk it down.

All my love, always and forever,

Dad

 

 

7 years, 4 months, and 3 days. Be kind to your audience and don’t give cause for pause.

My dearest Shosh and Jaialai:

Know your audience.  That goes without saying.

But more importantly, be kind to your audience.  Communication is already difficult enough as it is without throwing in individual biases, cognitive dissonance, cognitive distortions, etc.  Add to that life’s challenges facing each member of the audience outside of the communicative situation and you have a recipe for disaster, miscommunication, and misunderstanding.  Thus, be kind to your audience.

Simplify your message.  Target it to your audience.  For example, if you are talking to someone who is into basketball, use the language of basketball and basketball analogies.  In other words, use language they are more likely to understand and use paradigms with which they are more familiar.  If I use cooking analogies with an audience who are into basketball, I will likely turn them off or at least fail to capture their attention.  Conversely, if I use the language of basketball and references to basketball greats, I will more likely capture their interests.

Also, as you communicate, choose your words with care and don’t give cause for pause.  Let me unpack the latter.

In a recent conversation about permissive parenting and the challenges that pose to the children who missed opportunities to learn self-discipline, the value of personal efforts, etc., a friend said, “It is challenging to work with children of poor people because they lack good social skills.”  The reference to “children of poor people” gave pause because not all children of people of lower social economic status behave poorly.  Arguably, many children of the well-to-do are also challenged with bad behaviors.  Thus, had she said, “It is challenging to work with children who are poorly raised” I would have readily agreed and there would not have been a break in the flow of her argument.

The lesson here is to use appropriate language and give appropriate chunks of information so that your audience can easily follow your train of thought without much resistance.  Let each thought builds upon the preceding and takes your audience towards your logical conclusion.

That is easy enough to say, but the mindfulness necessary to execute the task can be challenging.  For example, it means avoid using words of judgment that may trigger certain members of the audience.  It also means breaking down complex ideas into easy to digest chunks that you can present to your audience.

Too often, for convenience and expediency, people regurgitate what they’ve heard or learned without bothering to repackage the information for their target audience.  This is unwise.

People are giving you their attention and are counting on you to do the heavy lifting so that they wouldn’t have to.  If you want them to continue to give you their attention, their time, their business, etc., deliver that.  They will thank you for it and will return to you time and again.

Two experiences in my life support this lesson.

I first learned this lesson early in my career when I worked for the Congressional Affairs Department.  The Vice President of Government Affairs, of which we were a part, asked me to draft comments to proposed rule making.   (Federal regulations fell outside the scope of my legislative work, but she was the boss.)  Anyway, I took pains to interview members of the trade association to get their feedback and drafted a plain-spoken letter which presented their concerns in a manner which the members could understand.  In other words, I chose not to use technical legal jargon befitting of a lawyer.

That strategy worked well.  The Vice President reviewed my work and came down to my office to praise me for the approach.  As an accomplished lawyer who had once headed major federal agencies, she said too many lawyers communicate poorly by trying too hard to sound like a lawyer and by trying to show off their legal knowledge without regards to the needs of the audience.  (Subsequently, the Vice President promoted me to Manager of Employment Legislation and Regulations.)

The point of all communications is to convey the message as simply and as clearly as possible for the target audience.  Lawyers, by nature, are generalists and often lack the industry experience which their clients have.  Consequently, lawyers who draft proposed rules frequently fail to understand the realities facing the employers and employees affected by the proposed rules.  (For example, my clients were diverse and included Hewlett-Packard, universities, hospitals, government agencies, etc.)  Giving clear and specific examples of real life situations adversely affected by the proposed rules was more effective at educating the drafters than abstract legal arguments.

The lesson was brought home when I subsequently worked for a law firm and was asked to provide legal updates to one of our major clients which had a presence in 48 states.  In prior years, other lawyers assigned the task simply researched all relevant provisions of state laws, made copies of those provisions, and sent thick binders containing those provisions to client.  The work was thorough and competent.  The client was obviously sufficiently satisfied to return time and again for such service.

I took a different approach.  Instead of simply giving the in-house counsel stacks of laws which he would have to wade through whenever a branch office called him for legal advice, I gave him a chart that simply stated whether the laws in each state would permit specific employment actions such as polygraph tests.  The column listed the 48 states and the rows listed specific employment issues of interest to the client.  Each box provided a short description of the state of the law and citations to relevant provisions of law for legal counsel to confirm.

The client loved the chart.  The named partner of the firm who hired me and assigned me that task loved the chart.  The reason was simple: I did the heavy lifting so that the client wouldn’t have to.

Give the audience what they want and need.  Do the heavy lifting so that they don’t have to.  Thus, when they turn to you for advice in times of difficulty, your words will serve to calm them instead of challenge them or give them cause for concern or stress.

Be kind to your audience.

All my love, always and forever,

Dad

 

7 years and 4 months. Grit. Get some.

The Fox & the Grapes

A Fox one day spied a beautiful bunch of ripe grapes hanging from a vine trained along the branches of a tree. The grapes seemed ready to burst with juice, and the Fox’s mouth watered as he gazed longingly at them.

The bunch hung from a high branch, and the Fox had to jump for it. The first time he jumped he missed it by a long way. So he walked off a short distance and took a running leap at it, only to fall short once more. Again and again he tried, but in vain.

Now he sat down and looked at the grapes in disgust.

“What a fool I am,” he said. “Here I am wearing myself out to get a bunch of sour grapes that are not worth gaping for.”

And off he walked very, very scornfully.

There are many who pretend to despise and belittle that which is beyond their reach.

http://read.gov/aesop/005.html

My dearest Shosh and Jaialai:

Times are tough.  I get it.  They’re tough for everyone.

The measure of a man is what he does during times of adversity.  Lesser men wilt.  They give up.  They give in to weaker impulses, blame others, then lie to themselves to make themselves feel better.  Yes, they are not unlike the fox who told himself the grapes he could not reach were sour and beneath his taste.

You have to but open the newspapers to see reports of such low-grade men, pretending to be their better .  They are easy to spot.  They are the ones making excuses for their failures or worse — casting aspersion on others and redefining their failures as successes.  Weak and incompetent people always make excuses, blame others for their failings, and shifting the burden of leadership unto others, while competent people of strength and caliber say, “The buck stops here.”  Yes, weak men are not unlike the fox telling himself the grapes are beneath him.  Some will be fooled by that, but not everyone … not those of quality and worth.

If you think only those of low caliber resort to such self-deception, you’d be wrong.  For example, Fairfax County School District is among a growing number of school districts nationwide which has adopted a “no-zero” policy where students cannot be failed for having made a “reasonable attempt.”

School districts in the Washington area and across the country are adopting grading practices that make it more difficult for students to flunk classes, that give students opportunities to retake exams or turn in late work, and that discourage or prohibit teachers from giving out zeroes.

The policies have stirred debates about the purpose of issuing academic grades and whether they should be used to punish, motivate or purely represent what students have learned in class. Some regard it as the latest in a line of ideas intended to keep students progressing through school and heading toward graduation, akin in some ways to practices like social promotion.

Under a new policy in Virginia’s Fairfax County, one of the nation’s largest school systems, middle and high school students can earn no lower than a score of 50 if they make a “reasonable attempt” to complete work. And for the first time this year, high school teachers who were going to fail a student had to reevaluate the student using “quality points,” making an F less detrimental to a student’s final grade. Prince George’s County in Maryland will limit failing grades to a 50 percent minimum score when students show a “good-faith effort.”

Proponents of the changes­ say the new grading systems are more fair and end up being more conducive to learning, encouraging students to catch up when they fall behind rather than just giving up. Many believe that giving a student a score of zero for an F — rather than, say, a score of 50 — on even just one bad assignment can doom students because climbing back to a passing grade can seem almost mathematically impossible. And such failures can put students on a path to dropping out before graduation.

But many are critical of the shift, arguing that teachers are losing important tools to enforce diligence and prepare students for college and the workplace. They say that artificially boosting student grades can mask failure and push students through who don’t know the material they need to know to actually succeed….

Many school systems also are moving toward “standards-based grading,” which emphasizes evaluating students on what they ultimately learn rather than on work habits, student effort, punctuality or homework.

The philosophy has driven Fairfax County to allow students to turn in work late and to retake major exams if they score below 80 percent; the county also limits homework to 10 percent of a student’s grade. Prince George’s officials will not allow behavior or attendance as factors in academic grades and will give students a second chance to improve their score on certain tests or assignments….

Theresa Mitchell Dudley, president of the Prince George’s County Educators’ Association, said that 42 to 69 percent of high school teachers who responded to a recent survey voiced concerns about some of the key recommended ­changes.

“We have no problem being fair to students,” she said. “But if they are not doing the work and not performing, and we give them a grade they did not earn, how does that make them college and career ready?” ….

“You can’t go to an employer and say, ‘Here’s my work, it’s two weeks late,’ and expect that your boss is not going to fire you,” she said.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/is-it-becoming-too-hard-to-fail-schools-are-shifting-toward-no-zero-grading-policies/2016/07/05/3c464f5e-3cb0-11e6-80bc-d06711fd2125_story.html (emphasis added)

You should know, Fairfax is the third wealthiest county in the U.S., with a median household income of $112,844.  https://www.forbes.com/pictures/5963ed594bbe6f269f7f2e9d/3-fairfax-county-va-media/#4e7918734606.  These are not children of want.

The sad thing is we are teaching generations of children not to try.  By giving everyone a trophy just for showing up, we are taking away opportunities for them to learn grit and the value of hard work.

As the line goes in The Incredibles, 

If we give everyone a trophy or gold star just for showing up, then those trophies and gold stars will be rendered worthless.  My trophy is no longer special if everyone else has one just like it for no more than showing up.

We mask our failing our students with excuses like “self-esteem” and other nice sounding words.  But imagine how much self-esteem those children will have when they get older and cannot hold good jobs for want to grit, perseverance, determination, etc.  In life, you do not get a trophy or a gold star just for showing up: you must successfully complete the work in time and in a condition acceptable to the organization.  If not, you’d get fired.

By not preparing our children to succeed in life, by permitting them to give in to their weaker impulses of not trying their best, we condemn them to a life of failure, of servitude.  This is particularly insidious as the world heads into the Age of AI, where machines take on greater shares of human toil.  In other words, we are sending children into the world as faceless undifferentiated low-skilled and low-educated labor pool.  To send our children into life without sufficient preparation is worst than sending our healthcare workers into battles without the necessary personal protective equipment because the latter is limited to one event in life whereas the former is for all events in life.  Even lions train their cubs for successful hunts so they cubs wouldn’t starve when they are older and must hunt on their own.  Are we no better?

In life, the only failure is in giving up without trying your best.  Failure is in yielding to your weaker impulses and your desire for convenience and expediency.  Don’t be like that.

Grit.  Get some.

All my love, always and forever,

Dad

P.S., One of my favorite books was All I Really Need to Know I Learned in Kindergarten, by Robert Fulghum.  To a large degree, I concur with him.  Most of what we need to learn, we were taught as children.  It would do you well to revisit those lessons and those stories of old — such as the story of the fox and the grapes, or the ant and the grasshopper.

 

7 years, 3 months, and 28 days. Seek first to understand and to help others. Kindness and joy will return to you in abundance.

My dearest Shosh and Jaialai:

All too often, people want to receive before they give.  They wait for acts of kindness and charity from others before being kind and charitable themselves.  Often, they wait in vain, while their lives linger in sadness and loneliness.

They are not necessarily bad people: they are just scared.  They fear being taken or cheated by others.  But they fail to recognize that other people are just as fearful of being cheated and taken.

If everyone waits for someone else to take the first step, the world will be full of people who never mature beyond their teenage years.  How sad would that be?!!!  What a horrible world that would be?!!!

Unfortunately, we don’t have to imagine it.  We bear witness to it daily as the mainstream and social media broadcasts the failings of “Me First” societies.  “I will if he will!”  It is so sad for these people to allow their lives to be defined by others, for their actions to be defined by others.

Life is not transactional.  Tit for tat.

What narrow worldview burdens those of small-minds who adhere to that belief!  Yet, too many live that way.  How sad!  To never experience the joy of kindness and friendship.  They may receive kindness and friendship, but they may not recognize it as such, always expecting others to want something in return, always looking for an ulterior motive, always expecting to be had by others.  How sad.

(As I’ve said before, to a thief, everyone is a thief because that’s how they think.  They are out to steal from others; thus, others must be out to steal from them!  Again, what we say and do says more about us than about others.)

Asians, for example, have been accused of being rude or ungrateful for not saying “thank you” when done a good turn by Westerners.  What the uninitiated failed to understand is that in Asian cultures, the formality of “thank you” and “please” create social distance in intimate relationship among friends.  For example, in Asia, it is common courtesy to offer gum, food, drinks, etc., to others before partaking of it ourselves, or to select the choicest morsel from the dishes served family style to put into the bowls of others.  No thank needed.  We serve others first, and most often they will serve us in return.  See, e.g., https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2015/06/thank-you-culture-india-america/395069/; and, https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2015/06/thank-you-chinese/395660/.

In America, that is not the case.  At meals, we are expected to serve ourselves first, then pass the dish to others for them to help themselves.

These cultural differences have deep ramifications.  Loneliness is an epidemic in America, for example, whereas in Asia few are in want of friendship or company when they experience personal sadness or difficulties.  See, e.g., https://www.hrsa.gov/enews/past-issues/2019/january-17/loneliness-epidemic; https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/the-power-and-prevalence-of-loneliness-2017011310977; and, https://www.ajc.com/news/health-med-fit-science/why-are-americans-lonely-massive-study-finds-nearly-half-feels-alone-young-adults-most-all/bbIKsU2Rr3qZI8WlukHfpK/.  Recent studies found that 48 percent of Americans reported having but one person in whom to confide matters of importance, and over 4 percent had none.  See, e.g., https://www.livescience.com/16879-close-friends-decrease-today.html.  Those numbers reflect a downward trend in friendship and closeness in America.  How sad.  Imagine the devastating effects this must have on our mental health during the corona virus pandemic when social distancing and telecommuting is common.

But it doesn’t have to be so.  As my dear friend Sue Kastriner from law school always advised, extend yourself.  The kindness you show others will be returned ten-fold.

More importantly, your outlook in life will change and you will learn to appreciate beauty and kindness where you once expected to see nothing but selfishness and greed.  Yes, there will be those who will abuse your kindness and generosity.  So what?  Life has unpleasant people.  Move on.  Don’t let them also suck joy from your lives.  Focus instead on being you and appreciating the kind souls who fill your lives with kindness and joy.

Despite our circumstances, Ms. L and I are fortunate in having friends who drop by every once in a while to drop off cooked meals or grocery items for us, especially during this pandemic.  In and of themselves, these treats are of minor economic value, but the kindness and thoughtfulness of their actions are overwhelming and invaluable.  We are blessed by their friendship and are eternally grateful for their presence in our lives.

So, seek first to understand and help others, my sons.  Your kindness will be rewarded in full … by your knowledge that you are a good person, by the kindness returned to you by those of value, and by the grace you accumulate in heaven for your acts of kindness and charity.

All my love, always and forever,

Dad

P.S., given the importance of the matter, let me reprint below the entire article about how “thank you” is not acultural.

In an essay for The Atlantic this week, Deepak Singh described the culture of saying “thank you” in Hindi. His explanation for why many Indians don’t say thanks out loud took me back to my early days in China, when I was struggling to learn Mandarin. Singh wrote:

In India, people—especially when they are your elders, relatives, or close friends—tend to feel that by thanking them, you’re violating your intimacy with them and creating formality and distance that shouldn’t exist.

One of the most jarring yet subtle aspects of my experience with Mandarin Chinese was the counterintuitive use—or lack of use—of thank you (xiexie), please (qing), and other softeners like “would,” “could,” “I’m sorry,” and “excuse me” that liberally season vernacular American English.

Here is what I wrote in my book Dreaming in Chinese about my struggle with this piece of Chinese language and culture:

I often feel like I’m being abrupt and blunt, and even rude, when I’m speaking Chinese. Bu yao (don’t want), bu yong (don’t need), mei yǒu (don’t have), bu shi (is not), bu keyǐ (cannot)—all these are standard forms of declining offers or requests, or saying no. But each time I use them, I fight the urge to pad them with a few niceties like “thank you,” “excuse me,” or “I’m sorry.”

Blunt is what I hear back from the Chinese as well, but from them it does not seem intended as rude. It is just what it is. Here are some classic scenes from my everyday life:

Passengers inside jam-packed subway cars jostle and yell “Xia che!”, “Off the car!” There is no “Excuse me,” “pardon me,” or “sorry” to be heard.

In any public place, a mobile phone rings and some one screams the greeting “Wei!,” a response that reaches the decibel level of a yell of “FIRE!” in a crowded theater.

Fuwuyuan! Fuwuyuan!” or “Waitress! Waitress!” diners cry to demand a glass, a bowl, or a pair of chopsticks. And no “Miss, could you please get me another beer?”

That is the etiquette of the street. On a more intimate level, the grammar of politeness is equally complex. On the one hand, the people in China can be effortlessly gentle and courteous.

Take, for instance, the Beijing tradition of man zǒuMan means “slowly” and zǒu means “walk,” or colloquially “walk slowly.” Man zǒu is the tender goodbye offered from every small shopkeeper I have visited in Beijing. It is usually spoken in a quiet voice, and somehow sounds so much more sincere than “Have a nice day.” Sometimes I will make the trip to my neighborhood laundry with a single shirt for cleaning, just as an excuse to hear the “man zǒu” when I leave the shop.

At the same time, among good friends, the contrasts between the politesse of what you do and the bluntness of what you say can seem baffling. At a restaurant with friends, a delicate choreography will have one person carefully select a few choice morsels from the common bowl and place them on a neighbor’s plate. It is a small, perfect gesture. Another person will pour tea or beer for everyone else before even considering pouring his own. And then another will announce “Gei wǒ yan!”, literally “Give me salt!”, with no sign of a please or thank you involved. I’m always taken a little aback and bite my tongue to stifle a “Say please!” after so many years of training children in Western table manners.

My Chinese friends say they notice that Westerners use lots of pleases (qǐng) and thank yous (xiexie) when speaking Chinese. And actually, they say, we use way too many of them for Chinese taste. A Chinese linguist, Kaidi Zhan, says that using a please, as in “Please pass the salt,” actually has the opposite effect of politeness here in China. The Chinese way of being polite to each other with words is to shorten the social distance between you. And saying please serves to insert a kind of buffer or space that says, in effect, that we need some formality between us here.

One of my tutors, a young guy named Danny, who straddles the line between being a Chinese nationalist and being an edgy global youth, nodded his head enthusiastically when I asked him about this interpretation: “Good friends are so close, they are like part of you,” Danny said. “Why would you say please or thank you to yourself? It doesn’t make sense.”

The first Mandarin term that Westerners usually learn is ni hǎo, the greeting. The second is probably xiexie, or thank you. It’s a comforting way to become acquainted with a language. But it’s worth keeping in mind how the generous and well-intended use of xiexie sounds to Chinese ears.

We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to letters@theatlantic.com.

DEBORAH FALLOWS is a Fellow at New America. She is the author of Dreaming in Chineseand co-author with James Fallows ofOur Towns: A 100,000-Mile Journey into the Heart of America.

7 years, 3 months, and 25 days. Set high bars for yourselves.

My most dearest Shosh and Jaialai:

The single greatest failing of most parents and individuals is the failing to set high bars for their children or themselves.  People, especially kids, will rise to most challenges.  They will push themselves and surpass expectations.

Unfortunately, we have such low expectations for ourselves and others.  Then, we get disappointed.  In other words, we expect failure, then are disappointed when it arrives.  Why?

This is in line with the “Broken Window” theory or the theory that if you need something done, give it to the busy person.   Let me explain the former.  The theory is that if people go to the park and it is full of trash, they are more likely to litter since it is already full of garbage.  They are less likely to care about adding to the mess, even if they know littering is wrong.  In other words, the existence of litter lowers their standards.  However, if the park is clean and free of debris, only the greatest of jerks would litter and defile the pristine condition for themselves and others.

We witnessed this in person not too long ago.  While overseas, we were invited to a party by local friends.  We witnessed another American drinking a can of soda, then dropping it on the floor and kicking it into the corner.  When he saw us looking at him, he was embarrassed and said, “When in Rome, do as Romans.”  His conducts tell us that he lacks self-discipline.  He knew better, but was simply too lazy to dispose of the can in the trash as little kids in America have been taught since preschool.

A low bar tells the individual for whom that low bar was set that he/she is of low skill and, consequently, is of low value.  If everyone has such low expectations for him/her, why should she bother to try hard.  Everyone already thinks he/she is a failure, so why bother?

(This is why I abhor labels.  They do nothing but hold people back.  The use of labels also harm the person applying the labels to others.  It makes him/her intellectually lazy or worse, dishonest.  It’s easier to reach for a label than to really assess the strengths and weaknesses of someone.  We all have strengths and weaknesses, and no single label can possibly define any of us.)

As Henry Ford noted, success or failure is a mindset.  Train yourselves to have a positive and success-oriented mindset.  Keep your eyes on the prize.

Continue to move towards your goals no matter the obstacles.  Think and assess before you act as you encounter each challenge.

Note the problems in your way but focus on finding solutions instead of dwelling on the problems until they take on epic proportions as most people are wont to do.

Don’t go on autopilot and repeat the age-old mistake of “it’s worked before.”  The Phillips screwdriver you have in your hand won’t work on the hexagon screw used in the next project.

I read recently a study in which subjects were given three big jugs of various sizes and asked to measure out the exact amount of water in the shortest amount of time possible.  The solution to this first challenge is to fill the biggest jug with water then use that to fill the two smaller jugs.  What remains in the big jug would be the correct amount.  (We saw a variation of this in Die Hard with Bruce Willis and Samuel L. Jackson.)   Next, the same subjects were asked to measure out a much smaller quantity of water.  They immediately resorted to the same strategy of filling the biggest jug.  Had they stopped to think, they would realize the sum total of the two small jugs is the correct amount.  When the scientists gave the second set of instructions to new subjects who had not been given the first set of instructions, they quickly saw the solution as filling the two smaller jugs.

In other words, each challenge requires its own solution.  Don’t be the man with the hammer for whom all the world is a nail.

Fear not failure.  If you are given but a hammer, make it work.  Try different ways to use the hammer and try using different parts of the hammer.  If that doesn’t work, try using the hammer to make other tools as necessary to resolve the problem.  The failure is in not trying or in giving up.  (But also know when to give up.)

Set high goals for yourselves, my sons.  You won’t be disappointed.

All  my love, always and forever,

Dad

 

7 years, 3 months, and 23 days. Ask the right questions.

My most dearest Shosh and Jaialai:

Fools rush in.  Always give pause to make sure you are asking the right questions.

For example, we know of a wonderful and bright kid who has received almost $500,000 in scholarships — half a million dollars!!!  That’s very impressive!!! That’s wonderful, right?  That’s to his credit for being the person he is.

What if I told you that although many schools gave him money, none gave him enough to attend their institution?  They often gave him a third to a half of the total costs to attend their institution.  In other words, they have reduced his costs from that of an international student to that of a local student.  However, he is still expected to pay full fare as a local student.

Think about it for a minute: what is the cost to me as a university with 5,000 – 25,000 students to have one more student?  The cost is marginal and minimal to the university.  Yet, the benefit is great for the university because it has one more student who pays full fare.

The picture doesn’t look as rosy now, does it?   This, too, is a reflection of who he is — someone who is bright and talented, but who subscribes to the principle of “good enough.”

My point here is that the right question makes all the difference in the world.

In the first instance, fools rush to judgment and are easily impressed.  They ask, “Half a million in scholarship?  Really?  Wow, you must be very smart!  You will be successful in life.”  Too many limit their analysis to the data given and do not attempt to dig deeper.  They are lazy thinkers and of poor habits.  Be not like them, my sons.

In the second instance, the more intelligent and insightful ask, “What percentage of costs does each scholarship represent?”  These gain valuable information about the context for which to assess the data given and to judge the caliber of the child.  Be like them, my sons.

Think first before you rush to swallow whole what others feed you or ask of you.  Ask questions.  Examine assumptions.  Before you act, assess what information was given you, how it jives with what you already know (thus, the import of reading voraciously and having a depth and breadth of understanding), and what is missing, misleading or false.

For example, even as the landline telephone technology was being rolled out across the world, a young engineer at Motorolla asked, ““Why is it that when we want to call and talk to a person, we have to call a place?”  https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidsturt/2013/10/18/are-you-asking-the-right-question/#3967fb3976c5.  His examination of the false assumption that phones must be affixed to particular locations gave rise to the world of mobile phones and smart phones we know and love today.

In the graduate program in public policy program at Duke University, we spent almost half a year on “problem definition” — what is the problem?  If you misstate the problem, then you will solve for the wrong solution.  So, stop.  First, take time to ensure you are asking the right questions before you rush off to search for solutions.

Early in law school, I remember a hypothetical in which an ordinance was passed to protect park goers by prohibiting cars in the park.  That makes sense, right?  Lots of children run around and play in the park.  People lay out to tan themselves, read books, enjoy a picnic, etc.  Driving a car in the park endangers those children and people.

But what if someone got injured in the park or had a heart attack?  Ambulances cannot get to them because the law prohibits cars in the park.  OK, so we make exception for ambulances.  But what if the ambulance were stuck in traffic and it would be faster for someone to get his car from the parking lot, drive into the park to pick up the injured, and take her to the hospital?  What if the police had to drive into the park to arrest someone?  What about garbage trucks having to pick up trash bins in the park?  Would mountain bikers zipping through the grass and the tress also pose a danger to park goers?   Now, we see a ban on cars would be an insufficient solution and more analysis is required to better protect park goers while ensuring various types activities could safely be performed and enjoyed in the public park.

Learn to give pause to ask the right questions.

Everything you say and do reveals something about you.  What do your questions reveal about you?  Are you one of those easily impressed by the superficial, or an insightful individual who seeks deeper understanding of situations?  Be the latter.

All my love, always and forever,

Dad

P.S., below are several other articles on asking the right questions:

P.S.S., by the way, the child is very impressive and will go far in life once he conquers his areas of weakness.

7 years, 3 months, and 21 days. Watch the attitude and beware the “good enough”.

My most dearest Shosh and Jaialai:

Watch the attitude.  No one likes the dour and the negative.  Be positive.

Have you noticed how interacting with negative people drains you while engaging with positive people lifts you up and inspires you?  Let that knowledge guide your actions and behaviors.  Be the “cup half-full” type of person to whom people are drawn.

Smile, even when you don’t feel like it.  There’s magic in your smile, and the science to back that up.

How Smiling Affects Your Brain

Each time you smile, you throw a little feel-good party in your brain. The act of smiling activates neural messaging that benefits your health and happiness.

For starters, smiling activates the release of neuropeptides that work toward fighting off stress (3). Neuropeptides are tiny molecules that allow neurons to communicate. They facilitate messaging to the whole body when we are happy, sad, angry, depressed, or excited. The feel-good neurotransmitters—dopamine, endorphins and serotonin—are all released when a smile flashes across your face as well (4). This not only relaxes your body, but it can also lower your heart rate and blood pressure.

The endorphins also act as a natural pain reliever—100-percent organic and without the potential negative side effects of synthetic concoctions (4).

Finally, the serotonin release brought on by your smile serves as an anti-depressant/mood lifter (5). Many of today’s pharmaceutical anti-depressants also influence the levels of serotonin in your brain, but with a smile, you again don’t have to worry about negative side effects—and you don’t need a prescription from your doctor.

How Smiling Affects Your Body

You’re actually better-looking when you smile—and I’m not just trying to butter you up. When you smile, people treat you differently. You’re viewed as attractive, reliable, relaxed, and sincere. A study published in the journal Neuropsychologia reported that seeing an attractive, smiling face activates your orbitofrontal cortex, the region in your brain that processes sensory rewards. This suggests that when you view a person smiling, you actually feel rewarded.

It also explains the 2011 findings by researchers at the Face Research Laboratory at the University of Aberdeen, Scotland. Subjects were asked to rate smiling and attractiveness. They found that both men and women were more attracted to images of people who made eye contact and smiled than those who did not (6). If you don’t believe me, see how many looks you get when you walk outside with that smile you’re wearing right now. (You’re still smiling like I asked, right?)

How Smiling Affects Those Around You

Did you know that your smile is actually contagious? The part of your brain that is responsible for your facial expression of smiling when happy or mimicking another’s smile resides in the cingulate cortex, an unconscious automatic response area (7). In a Swedish study, subjects were shown pictures of several emotions: joy, angerfear, and surprise. When the picture of someone smiling was presented, the researchers asked the subjects to frown. Instead, they found that the facial expressions went directly to imitation of what subjects saw (8). It took conscious effort to turn that smile upside-down. So if you’re smiling at someone, it’s likely they can’t help but smile back. If they don’t, they’re making a conscious effort not to.

Looking at the bigger picture, each time you smile at a person, their brain coaxes them to return the favor. You are creating a symbiotic relationship that allows both of you to release feel-good chemicals in your brain, activate reward centers, make you both more attractive, and increase the chances of you both living longer, healthier lives.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/cutting-edge-leadership/201206/there-s-magic-in-your-smile

People are drawn to those with good attitude.  So, have a good attitude.

Life is hard enough as it is for everyone.  Why make it worse for yourself and those around you by displaying your frowns and angry faces?  Smile.

More importantly, by having a positive mental attitude, you are mentally more open to the possibilities rather than restricting your focus to the limitations that hold back the dour and the negative.  Success lies in the possibilities, not the limitations.

Thus, be positive, surround yourself with positive people, and work the possibilities.  Be not limited by what is and that which restricts us — as unsuccessful people, who blames the world and others, are wont to do.

Look up.  Look forward.  Aspire for better.

That leads me to my second point: the folly of “good enough”.  The question is good enough for what?  Good enough to get you a job as a dishwasher?  Good enough for admission to a crappy college where fewer then 10 percent graduate after 4 years of college?

Now, to be fair, to each his own.  If that is your skill level, intellect, life situation, etc., there is nothing wrong with working as a dishwasher or attending a less selective college.  (For example, I once worked as a waiter and a door-to-door book salesman to pay my way through college.)  It is better than being lazy and uneducated.

However, those are not your limitations.  You are both bright, hardworking, and imaginative boys.  You have what it takes to succeed, but success will not come unless you work at it.  (Now, success, like happiness, ensues and is not to be pursued — as Viktor Frankl posits — but that is discussion for another day.)

Always do your best under the circumstances.  If it’s the best you can do given time limitation, resource limitations, etc., then — and only then — it is good enough.  Those of quality and caliber will recognize your efforts and your winning attitude.

Too many in life do half-ass jobs and call it good enough.  Good people also recognize these as the low-caliber people they are, and eschew them.  Don’t be like them.  Be extraordinary.

Today’s lessons comes with two caveats.

First, don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good.  Like I said, do the best you can under the circumstances.  We never have unlimited time to do anything in life, and the window of opportunity closes.  Thus, do the best you can under the circumstances, then let go.  Strive for perfection — within your time and resource limits, tolerance, etc. — but know that it is rarely attained.  Don’t hold back and wait for the perfect.  No one benefits from that.

Second, you are good enough as a person.  Don’t ever let anyone tell you otherwise.

You have kind hearts and are of good manners and industry.  Those are the things that truly matter in life.  No matter our stations in life, our intellect, our abilities, etc., we can all be kindhearted, instead of cruel; we can all treat each other well, instead of rudely or brusquely; and, we can all work hard, instead of be lazy and reliant on the hard work of others.

Everyone has  flaws.  Everyone has room for improvements.

Life is the crucible in which we test our mettle and strengthen ourselves.  Accept who you are at your core, and work to improve your skills and to improve life for yourself and for those around you.

Test your mettle.  Strive for improvement.  Be the Man in the Arena.  Ignore the critics who live tepid lives, ridden with fear, and who kibitz from the comfort of their soiled and sunken couches.

You are the judge of you, and you know within your heart of hearts whether you are living up to your talents and expectations.  Do your best.  Don’t let others define you.

All my love, always and forever,

Dad